blog:20260323

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision		 Previous revision
blog:20260323 [2026/03/23 21:33] – Sterling Olsonblog:20260323 [2026/03/24 02:37] (current) – Sterling Olson
Line 27: Line 27:
 |  20260323T2025 | 9 Gem | r |  600ms | 150 | 1.066 | 6.2(V) | 06 | +23 | High-Pol | Main | Astropol | F: 2620.1  | |  20260323T2025 | 9 Gem | r |  600ms | 150 | 1.066 | 6.2(V) | 06 | +23 | High-Pol | Main | Astropol | F: 2620.1  |
 |  20260313T2055 | Beta Leo | r |  70ms | 150 | 1.868 | 2.1(V) | 01 | +58 | High-Pol | Main | Astropol | F: 2621.7  | |  20260313T2055 | Beta Leo | r |  70ms | 150 | 1.868 | 2.1(V) | 01 | +58 | High-Pol | Main | Astropol | F: 2621.7  |
 +|  20260314T0155 | Beta Leo | r |  70ms | 150 | 1.134 | 2.1(V) | 01 | +58 | High-Pol | Main | Astropol | F: 2621.7  |
 +
  
 =====Log===== =====Log=====
Line 54: Line 56:
  
 2133 - Stopping new captures due to current cloud coverage while waiting for improvement 2133 - Stopping new captures due to current cloud coverage while waiting for improvement
 +
 +0145 - Resuming observing, cloud cover is back to acceptable levels
 +
 +0146 - Skipping OI 280, as it is now at 20deg altitude, and the capture is expected to take 90 mins, taking it below the horizon limit 20 minutes into the capture
 +
 +0147 - 9 Gem is at 9deg altitude, skipping
 +
 +0149 - WD1542+182 is below the horizon, skipping
 +
 +0150 - Beta Leo is viable; slewing to Beta Leo
 +
 +0158 - Clouds fully obscuring captures of Beta Leo for 30s at a time
 +
 +0224 - Beta Leo complete. Beginning shutdown procedures
 +
 +
 +
 +
  
 =====ToDo===== =====ToDo=====
  
 =====Notes===== =====Notes=====
 +  * Is there a bad cloud cover protocol? Is it worth it to still take data? How badly does cloud cover coming in and out affect the data?
  
 +  * While bringing the ladder in it looks like the airspace around campus is being covered by super thick cumulus clouds while Baltimore looks pretty clear in the horizon. This is why the data wasn't working for us. When asking NOAA for weather data around arbutus/halethorpe, it tells automatically tells us data for Baltimore, since that's the closest forecast office to us - we don't have our own. Going forward. we learned skybot can be very wrong on whether we will be able to observe. It should be protocol for operators to go out and check the sky regularly if waiting for clouds to clear - we waited too long because we relied on the NOAA data. 
 =====Weather===== =====Weather=====
 | Time | Temp | Humidity | | Time | Temp | Humidity |
Line 65: Line 87:
 | 2000 | 44 | 53 | | 2000 | 44 | 53 |
 | 2100 | 42 | 57 | | 2100 | 42 | 57 |
 +
  
 =====Data===== =====Data=====