Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
train:lectures:telescopeoptics [2024/03/18 15:56] – Roy Prouty | train:lectures:telescopeoptics [2024/03/24 12:54] (current) – Roy Prouty | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{url> | {{url> | ||
- | =====Telescope Optics===== | + | =====Telescope Optics |
The Primary Optical device is the first lens or mirror that light touches. The diameter of the Primary Optical Device is also (generally) the Aperture Diameter. The light-gathering power of a telescope depends on the area of the aperture, and so this " | The Primary Optical device is the first lens or mirror that light touches. The diameter of the Primary Optical Device is also (generally) the Aperture Diameter. The light-gathering power of a telescope depends on the area of the aperture, and so this " | ||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
===Diffraction Limited=== | ===Diffraction Limited=== | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
There exists a fundamental limit to the angular resolution of any telescope. This is because light diffracts around the edges of the aperture. This diffraction has the effect of smearing out the incident light into an Airy Disk. | There exists a fundamental limit to the angular resolution of any telescope. This is because light diffracts around the edges of the aperture. This diffraction has the effect of smearing out the incident light into an Airy Disk. | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
{{: | {{: | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | This diffraction can cause two distinct light sources to seem to merge on the focal plane -- effectively reducing the angular resolution of the system. The Rayleigh Criterion is the threshold of resolving point sources angularly. It is based on the wavelength of the incident light and the diameter of the aperture. | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | \\ | ||
+ | If the only hindrance to angular resolution is the focal length, detector size, and this fundamental diffraction limit, the system is said to be " | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Seeing Limited=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Many ground-based telescopes //dream// of being diffraction limited. Our functional angular resolution is much higher than this diffraction limit since we must also deal with a turbulent atmosphere. This turbulent atmosphere creates many interfaces on which incident star light can refract (even if only very slightly) and therefore change direction. Over the course of the exposure time of the image (the integration time), these slight deviations in direction have the effect of smearing the incident light over a region of the detector called the " | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | Written by Roy Prouty 20240318\\ | ||
+ | Reviewed by | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{url> | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | =====Telescope Optics II===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Point-Spread Function==== | ||
+ | The point spread function (PSF) describes the response of a focused optical imaging system to a point source. The PSF is the mathematical model that is thought to be convolved with any point source to generate the final image. For simplicity, let's choose a Gaussian PSF for our purposes. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====Effective Angular Resolution==== | ||
+ | By choosing a simple PSF, we can more easily probe key measures, such as the width of the PSF at a certain level. We chose a Gaussian, but we may use more complicated (and better fitting) profiles in the future. So let's avoid using the standard of deviation ($\sigma$) as this width parameter -- let's instead choose the full-width, half-max (FWHM) as the width parameter. | ||
+ | |||
+ | For a Gaussian of the form $f(x; | ||
+ | |||
+ | $$A\exp^{-x_0^2/ | ||
+ | $$\exp^{-x_0^2/ | ||
+ | $$\frac{-x_0^2}{2\sigma^2} = \ln{\frac{1}{2}}$$ | ||
+ | $$x_0^2 = \sigma^2 2\ln{2}$$ | ||
+ | $$x_0 = \pm\sqrt{\sigma^2 2\ln{2}}$$ | ||
+ | $$x_0 = \pm\sigma\sqrt{2\ln{2}}$$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | Leaving us with the FWHM of: $2 \sigma\sqrt{2\ln{2}}$ | ||
+ | |||
+ | This FWHM is what we use to report our effective angular resolution. The FWHM (similar to the standard of deviation, $\sigma$) is measured in pixels in image space, but is most useful to discuss in terms of seconds of arc ('' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Determine the effective angular resolution of the " | ||
+ | |||
+ | [{{: | ||
+ | Consider a telescope unencumbered by pesky atmosphere and is therefore observing an Airy Disk when observing a point source. Take the $x$ axis to be the number of pixels relative to the center of the profile and estimate the Angular Resolution. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ====Seeing Limited==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | [{{https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [{{https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Due to the turbulent and inhomogeneous atmosphere, rays of light have many opportunities to refract upon impinging a volume of atmosphere with differing optical properties (think: index of refraction from Snell' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Determine the effective angular resolution of the "Sum of 3000 Disp. Airys" profile shown above. Assume the ASI 432 is placed on the main scope. | ||
+ | |||
+ | An optical system whose angular resolution is limited by these repeated refraction events is said to be **Seeing Limited**. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Determining the Effective Angular Resolution of Our Telescope ==== | ||
+ | - The effective angular resolution (' | ||
+ | - We expect that the Planetary Boundary Layer is unstable near sunset and sunrise, giving rise to increased turbulence/ | ||
+ | - We expect that the seeing depends on the temperature, | ||
+ | |||
+ | In order to measure our instantaneous angular resolution, we need to find the FWHM of a source profile. To generate a source profile, we need to observe a source: | ||
+ | - that is point-like; meaning: | ||
+ | - far away | ||
+ | - not a visual binary(+) star system | ||
+ | - long enough that the full range of displacements is sampled | ||
+ | - short enough that the pixels don't ' | ||
+ | |||
+ | With this observation, | ||
+ | |||
+ | The source in the image can be thought of as tracing out a 3-D surface. Two of the dimensions are the pixel location, and the final dimension is the pixel value. | ||
+ | |||
+ | We can extract a profile from this surface by just taking a " | ||
+ | |||
+ | ====CODE==== | ||
+ | [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | $^1$: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Written by Roy Prouty | ||
+ | |||
+ | Reviewed by | ||