Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| train:lectures:telescopeoptics [2024/03/18 16:09] – Roy Prouty | train:lectures:telescopeoptics [2024/03/24 12:54] (current) – Roy Prouty | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{url> | {{url> | ||
| - | =====Telescope Optics===== | + | =====Telescope Optics |
| The Primary Optical device is the first lens or mirror that light touches. The diameter of the Primary Optical Device is also (generally) the Aperture Diameter. The light-gathering power of a telescope depends on the area of the aperture, and so this " | The Primary Optical device is the first lens or mirror that light touches. The diameter of the Primary Optical Device is also (generally) the Aperture Diameter. The light-gathering power of a telescope depends on the area of the aperture, and so this " | ||
| Line 51: | Line 51: | ||
| ===Seeing Limited=== | ===Seeing Limited=== | ||
| - | Many ground-based telescopes | + | Many ground-based telescopes |
| ---- | ---- | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
| Written by Roy Prouty 20240318\\ | Written by Roy Prouty 20240318\\ | ||
| Reviewed by | Reviewed by | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{url> | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | =====Telescope Optics II===== | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Point-Spread Function==== | ||
| + | The point spread function (PSF) describes the response of a focused optical imaging system to a point source. The PSF is the mathematical model that is thought to be convolved with any point source to generate the final image. For simplicity, let's choose a Gaussian PSF for our purposes. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====Effective Angular Resolution==== | ||
| + | By choosing a simple PSF, we can more easily probe key measures, such as the width of the PSF at a certain level. We chose a Gaussian, but we may use more complicated (and better fitting) profiles in the future. So let's avoid using the standard of deviation ($\sigma$) as this width parameter -- let's instead choose the full-width, half-max (FWHM) as the width parameter. | ||
| + | |||
| + | For a Gaussian of the form $f(x; | ||
| + | |||
| + | $$A\exp^{-x_0^2/ | ||
| + | $$\exp^{-x_0^2/ | ||
| + | $$\frac{-x_0^2}{2\sigma^2} = \ln{\frac{1}{2}}$$ | ||
| + | $$x_0^2 = \sigma^2 2\ln{2}$$ | ||
| + | $$x_0 = \pm\sqrt{\sigma^2 2\ln{2}}$$ | ||
| + | $$x_0 = \pm\sigma\sqrt{2\ln{2}}$$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | Leaving us with the FWHM of: $2 \sigma\sqrt{2\ln{2}}$ | ||
| + | |||
| + | This FWHM is what we use to report our effective angular resolution. The FWHM (similar to the standard of deviation, $\sigma$) is measured in pixels in image space, but is most useful to discuss in terms of seconds of arc ('' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Determine the effective angular resolution of the " | ||
| + | |||
| + | [{{: | ||
| + | Consider a telescope unencumbered by pesky atmosphere and is therefore observing an Airy Disk when observing a point source. Take the $x$ axis to be the number of pixels relative to the center of the profile and estimate the Angular Resolution. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | ====Seeing Limited==== | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | [{{https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | [{{https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | Due to the turbulent and inhomogeneous atmosphere, rays of light have many opportunities to refract upon impinging a volume of atmosphere with differing optical properties (think: index of refraction from Snell' | ||
| + | |||
| + | Determine the effective angular resolution of the "Sum of 3000 Disp. Airys" profile shown above. Assume the ASI 432 is placed on the main scope. | ||
| + | |||
| + | An optical system whose angular resolution is limited by these repeated refraction events is said to be **Seeing Limited**. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==== Determining the Effective Angular Resolution of Our Telescope ==== | ||
| + | - The effective angular resolution (' | ||
| + | - We expect that the Planetary Boundary Layer is unstable near sunset and sunrise, giving rise to increased turbulence/ | ||
| + | - We expect that the seeing depends on the temperature, | ||
| + | |||
| + | In order to measure our instantaneous angular resolution, we need to find the FWHM of a source profile. To generate a source profile, we need to observe a source: | ||
| + | - that is point-like; meaning: | ||
| + | - far away | ||
| + | - not a visual binary(+) star system | ||
| + | - long enough that the full range of displacements is sampled | ||
| + | - short enough that the pixels don't ' | ||
| + | |||
| + | With this observation, | ||
| + | |||
| + | The source in the image can be thought of as tracing out a 3-D surface. Two of the dimensions are the pixel location, and the final dimension is the pixel value. | ||
| + | |||
| + | We can extract a profile from this surface by just taking a " | ||
| + | |||
| + | ====CODE==== | ||
| + | [[https:// | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | $^1$: | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Written by Roy Prouty | ||
| + | |||
| + | Reviewed by | ||
| + | |||