Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
wiki:astronomy:magnitude [2023/11/14 10:47] – Roy Prouty | wiki:astronomy:magnitude [2025/01/13 16:01] (current) – Roy Prouty | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | The radiative energy of a source can be given either in relative terms via some **magnitude scale** or in absolute terms via some measure of [[~: | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
The Greek astronomer Hipparchus is usually credited with the origin of the magnitude scale. He assigned the brightest stars he could see with his eye a magnitude of $1$ and the faintest a magnitude of $6$. However, in terms of the amount of energy received, a sixth magnitude star is not $6\times$ fainter than a first magnitude star, but more like $100\times$ fainter, due to the non-linear response of the human eye to light. \\ \\ | The Greek astronomer Hipparchus is usually credited with the origin of the magnitude scale. He assigned the brightest stars he could see with his eye a magnitude of $1$ and the faintest a magnitude of $6$. However, in terms of the amount of energy received, a sixth magnitude star is not $6\times$ fainter than a first magnitude star, but more like $100\times$ fainter, due to the non-linear response of the human eye to light. \\ \\ | ||
- | This led the English astronomer Norman Pogson to formalize the magnitude system in 1856. He proposed that a sixth magnitude star should be precisely $100\times$ fainter than a first magnitude star, so that each magnitude corresponds to a change in brightness of $100^{1/ | + | This led the English astronomer Norman Pogson to formalize the magnitude system in 1856. He proposed that a sixth magnitude star should be precisely $100\times$ fainter than a first magnitude star, so that each magnitude corresponds to a change in brightness of $100^{1/ |
- | Hence, Pogson' | + | Hence, Pogson' |
$$\frac{F_1}{F_2} = \biggl(100^{1/ | $$\frac{F_1}{F_2} = \biggl(100^{1/ | ||
- | where $F_1$ and $F_2$ are the fluxes of two stars, $m_1$ and $m_2$ are their magnitudes, and the minus sign in front of the exponent accounts for the fact that numerically larger magnitudes refer to fainter stars. It is important to note that the flux, $F$, in the above equation, and all the equations given below, refers to any linear measurement of the brightness of a star, e.g. the number of counts, joules, photons, energy, etc, received.\\ \\ | + | where $F_1$ and $F_2$ are the fluxes of two stars, $m_1$ and $m_2$ are their magnitudes, and the minus sign in front of the exponent accounts for the fact that numerically larger magnitudes refer to fainter stars((It is important to note that the flux, $F$, in the above equation, and all the equations given below, refers to any linear measurement of the brightness of a star, e.g. the number of counts, joules, photons, energy, etc, received.)).\\ \\ |
- | Taking logarithms of Pogson' | + | Taking logarithms of Pogson' |
$$\log_{10}\frac{F_1}{F_2} = -(m_1-m_2) \cdot \log_{10}(100^{1/ | $$\log_{10}\frac{F_1}{F_2} = -(m_1-m_2) \cdot \log_{10}(100^{1/ |